Monday, February 29, 2016

What is the equvalent fraction of 9 over 27 ? you have to divide.

If you are asking what I think you are asking, the correct answer is 1/3.


That would be the answer you get if you simplify 9/27.


The way you simplify a fraction is to divide both the top and the bottom by the largest number that will divide into both numbers exactly (leaving no remainder).


In the case of 9/27, 9 can divide both numbers exactly.  9/9 is, of course, 1.  27/9 is 3.


So once you divide both top and bottom by 9, you get 1/3.


That is the most simplified version of 9/27.


Please follow the link for more information on how to simplify fractions.

In The Old Man and the Sea, what would be some examples of quotes that reveals conflict?

This is a novella filled with lots and lots of conflict of all kinds.  (It is called The Old Man and the Sea, of course, which represents a kind of conflict right from the beginning.)  Anything which is Santiago against the fish is conflict.  For example:



Just then the fish gave a sudden lurch that pulled the old man down onto the bow and would have pulled him overboard if he had not braced himself and given some line.



Other external (physical) conflicts include man vs. shark, man vs. hand, man vs. hunger, man vs. sleepiness...and plenty more. 


Santiago also experiences an inner conflict in several ways.  He has to convince himself to keep going despite the pain. He fights his daydreaming in order to stay as focused as he needs to be. He also wavers in his resolve to kill this fish for which he has such respect.



Then he was sorry for the great fish that had nothing to eat and his determination to kill him never relaxed in his sorrow for him.



Santiago also has a man vs. society conflict, a society which calls him unlucky and old and not a good fisherman anymore. 


This entire reading is a story about conflict and how to persevere in the face of trying circumstances and against all odds.

In To Kill a Mockingbird, the author alludes to Ivanhoe. What insight or effect was created by the author? Why did the author choose this allusion?

Sir Walter Scott, author of Ivanhoe and many other romantic historical novels which made him rich and famous, has suffered a severe decline in popularity and critical esteem because of his sentimentality and artificial dialogue, among other things. Here is a sample of the dialogue from Ivanhoe, which is characteristic of the way all his men and women speak.



"Truly," said Wamba, without stirring from the spot, "I have consulted my legs upon this matter, and they are altogether of opinion, that to carry my gay garments through these sloughs, would be an act of unfriendship to my sovereign person and royal wardrobe; wherefore, Gurth, I advise thee to call off Fangs, and leave the herd to their destiny, which, whether they meet with bands of travelling soldiers, or of outlaws, or of wandering pilgrims, can be little else than to be converted into Normans before morning, to thy no small ease and comfort."



Mrs. Dubose's taste for Ivanhoe, or for any other novel by Sir Walter Scott, characterizes her as an old-fashioned, Southern-belle type of woman who dotes on romantic heroes and beautiful, gracious heroines behaving with decorum in a world of unreality, a sort of fairy-land past that never really existed. We can also imagine how the treacly prose and dialogue must have been torture for poor Jem to have to read and how it contributed to his punishment. He probably didn't understand one-tenth of what he was reading to this faded Southern belle. She is a relic of the Old South, not unlike William Faulkner's Emily Grierson in "A Rose for Emily" or Azalea Adair in O. Henry's "A Municipal Report."

Sunday, February 28, 2016

How much acceleration does a 747 jumbo jet of mass 6999 kg experience in takeoff when the thrust for each of four engines is 5999 N?Answer in units...

A plane which is taking off, or even flying, does not receive its upward thrust directly. The thrust of the engine provides a thrust which is parallel to the main axis of the plane, which at the time is parallel to the horizontal. The upward force for take-off of the plane, as well as to keep the plane in the air against the gravitational force, is provided by the force created by air acting against the wings of the speeding plane.


Thus when the plane just starts its run for the take off the entire force generated by the engines is used for accelerating the plane horizontally. If we assume that the air resistance and the rolling friction of the plane at the start of take off is zero the acceleration of the plane can be calculated as follows.


Thrust generated by 1 engine = 5999 N


Therefore total thrust generated by 4 engine = 5999*4 = 23996 N


The thrust used to accelerate the plane = (weight of plane)*acceleration =


Therefore: 6999*(acceleration) = 23996


Therefore: acceleration = 23996/6999 = 3.4285 m/s^2 (approximately)


Answer: The plane will experience acceleration of 3.4285 m/s^2

How is the King of Salem related to and contribute to or detract from Santiago's journey's success in The Alchemist by Coelho?

The other answers in this thread more or less explain the significance of the character Melchisedek in the "The Alchemist" but you may still be wondering why Paulo Coelho included this character in the story. It is because of the alchemy theme. Melchisedek is a significant figure in the Kabalistic tradition (which alchemy finds its roots in). According to Rabbinical tradition he is either the same person as Shem, the son of Noah and a high priest,  or a contemporary. Another, alternative teaching is that he is a manifestation of divinity itself, in the form of a man. In the alchemical tradition he is a man in his highest form; manifesting divinity. There are references to him in the Midrash, Zohar, and Tanakh (traditional Jewish books of Kabalistic value), but you might be more familiar with references in the Bible: Genesis 14:18 and Hebrews 7:1. Melchisedek, as a high priest, blesses Abraham upon his victorious return from battle against the four kings who had beseiged the cities of Sodom and Gamorrah and who had taken Abraham's nephew Lot prisoner. He brings bread and wine (the products of the earth) to Abraham and blesses him in the name of "God Most High, Creator of heaven and earth" (the blessing is the product of heaven and completes the formula). In return, Abraham gives a tenth of the spoils of battle. This is the reason Coelho's character requires a tenth of the boys possessions and the fortune teller makes the boy promise a tenth of the treasure he seeks. Coelho has woven a tale firmly rooted in the study of alchemy but has brought this dead system to life with his assertion that the universe conspires to help those who pursue their personal legend.


El Corazon del Ceilo

Which character in "In Another Country" can be considered the Hemingway hero, and why?

Of course it is Nick. In the story, In Another Country the reader realizes that Nick Adams is honest, virile, and, more important, a person of extreme sensitivity. By observing the particular state of mind of the young narrator at the beginning of the story, we see that what happens to the major makes a tremendous impact on the young, wounded soldier. He is the Hemingway hero because of his virility and honesty and especially his sensitivity.

Please characterize Pearl of Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter" What are three nouns or adjectives about pearl that indicate Pearl's strong...

As the symbol of Hester's sin, Pearl acts throughout the novel as Hester's reminder of her sin and her tormentor.  It is not until Chapter XXIII that Pearl becomes humanized as she kisses her father, the Reverend Dimmesdale as she, Hester, and he stand on the scaffold.


Two things that Pearl likes are tormenting her mother since the warfare of Hester's spirit is in her, and giving in to her elfish urges.  For instance, when Pearl accompanies her mother to the mansion of Governor Bellingham, she tortures her mother with "naughty merriment" as her mother's scarlet letter is exaggerated in the suit of armor that hangs before them. Also, when she and her mother  depart the mansion, Pearl "in utters scorn of her mother's attempt to quiet her, gave an eldritch scream,...not from any notion of obedience, but because the ...curiosity of her diposition was excited by the appearance" of two new people.  And, when questioned by the Reverend Mr. Wilson about who made her, she impishly replies that she was born of the rose bush outside the prison.


Three words that are descriptive of Pearl's feelings are in Chapter VIII as Pearl is described as "a wild and flighty little elf."  The child exhibits this behavior later in the novel as well when she and her mother are in the forest and Hester asks Pearl to cross the brook, but Pearl refuses until her mother reattaches the scarlet letter to her bosom.


One noun that describes qualities Pearl, as the embodiment of Hester's conscience as well as her sin, appreciates in others is honesty. For example, Pearl pulls away her hand from Dimmesdale when he refuses to stand with Hester at noon on the scaffold, complaining, "Thous was not bold!--thou wast not true!"


Goodness is another quality, for Pearl shrinks from the "black man."  When she spots Chillingworth in Chapter X, Pearl exhorts her mother to come away from him, for he will harm her.


The beauty of nature is still another quality that Pearl appreciates.  She loves the play of the sunlight upon her as she and her mother venture into the forest in Chapter XVI, and she enjoys the brook.

Why does the story of Pinnochio change the third person to 1st person? How does the story change with this shift? 2. When Pinocchio is lost in the...

First of all, this is not much of a story to begin with.  It's a summary of a story.  It's telling, not showing.  There are huge jumps in the narration, no dialogue, no dramatic arc. 


If you change the POV to 1st person Pinnochio, then the story will be told by a naive narrator.  He obviously doesn't know the motivations of the fox and cat--that deduction is left up to the reader.  So, the story takes on situational irony--the audience knows more than the protagonist. 


The function, then, of Pinnochio in first-person is to make it a coming-of-age story--he must learn to be gererous after being swindled.  Pinnochio must learn to be human-like before becoming a human.


In my opinion, the story (if told as one completely, not used as an exercise) is better in third person.  Since Pinnochio is a fable it should be styled for a young audience.  Third person allows for more maneuvering with character and plot.  It makes the unbelievable (wooden boy talking to animals) more believable.  First person narration delves into introspection and does not advance plot well, so a young audience might be confused.  Also, naive narrators do not match up well with naive audiences.  Such narrators work better with adults (think Huck Finn here).

What are the elements of storytelling and fiction in Things Fall Apart?

I'm not certain in which context you mean "elements"; pertaining to history or to literary devices. So I'll give you a little of each and point to an additional source.


Things Fall Apart, by Chinua Achebe, was written in 1958, at the commencement of Nigerian Independence, but it tells the story of pre-colonial village life of the 1890s. In this regard, it could be said that Things Fall Apart is purely fiction. However, Achebe used preserved oral story traditions, proverbs, myths and folk tales to reconstruct an authentic picture of pre-colonial Nigerian life.

The Igbo tribes, several hundred of them, have been in about the same location as they are today in Nigeria for between 2,000 and 3,000 years. They are an ancient people who have left behind artifacts of pottery and forged metals. The Igbo legends tell that the Igbo believe in one supreme god, called Chukwu, who demanded obedience. When European missionaries and colonialists came to Igboland, there was a clash of ways and beliefs resulting from European ideology of conversion and subjugation (it escaped these Europeans that the notions of "conversion" to Christianity and "subjugation" are contradictory being antithetical).

The tone of Things Fall Apart (the narrator's tone of voice reflecting feeling toward the story and/or characters based on language alone) is that of an ironic storyteller. The mood (the feeling of the story derived from the setting, objects, language, details) is energetic and energetic with a touch of desperation, and it vacillates between the balanced village calm and Okonkwo's grasping, bad temper and illogical behavior. The point of view is third person omniscient that provides the thoughts, feelings, actions, motives of any character, not just the protagonist, Okonkwo. The main themes are balance and imbalance between the male and female energies of Earth and the balance and imbalance between clashing cultures (i.e., the Igbo peoples against European intruders).



For additional information on the historic elements of Things Fall Apart, see the Preface, Forward, Introduction and Notes in the Heinemann Educational Publishers, of Harcourt Education Limited, 2000 edition of Things Fall Apart

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Read the play Trifles by Susan Glaspell. Look at the District Attorney and at the relationship of the Wrights.See how they are characterized. How...

A key factor you need to focus on when considering this question is how the relationship of the Wrights acts as a kind of symbol of gender relations of this period in general. Of course, your study of gender relations as they are presented in this play should not merely focus on the Wrights and their relationship, but also on the interactions and relationships between Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale and the males in the play, and in particular the assumptions that are made by the men about the women.


Focussing on the relationship between John and Minnie Wright, look closely at how Mrs. Hale describes Minnie before her marriage with John:



She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls singing int he choir. But that - oh, that was thirty years ago.



Then later she says:



She - come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself - real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and - fluttery. How - she - did - change.



Notice how the dashes in the last sentence really emphasises the pity and shock felt at the transformation of Minnie. Mrs. Hale presents a picture of a kind, lovely and sensitive woman who is then oppressed and constricted by her marriage to John Wright, who Mrs. Hale describes as being "close" and says:



But he was a hard man, Mrs. Peters. Just to pass the time of day with him. (Shivers) Like a raw wind that gets to the bone.



The assumption that John Wright killed the bird, who, as established above, can be said to symbolically represent Minnie, shows us the reality of their marriage. Minnie's personality was crushed and strangled by John Wright - she wasn't allowed to go out at all, and he didn't let her buy any nice clothes. This allows Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters to piece together the motive for the crime, that they then hide from the menfolk in a moving act of solidarity with Mrs. Wright. The arrogance of men is therefore represented, as is the very secret and private world of women that men cannot enter, penetrate, or "read" in the way that the women clearly can.

Why was Jonas' father important?From chapters 1-10 of The Giver.

Globally speaking, Jonas father is important in that he shows by his role that people and situations aren't always what they seem to be.  In Jonas' family unit, his mother is the brainy parent (a lawyer) and his father, a caregiver (a "Nurturer") for babies before they are placed in families.  At first Jonas' father comes over as the naturally paternal and understanding parent any kid would covet. However, later in the story, the readers (and Jonas) learn that in spite of his role as a Nurturer, he sometimes kills babies simply because they don't fit into society's plan and are declared better off "Elsewhere." His nonchalent dismissal upon killing a twin - "Bye, bye, little guy - shows complete moral and emotional detachment, as he shoves the body of the newborn down a garbage chute after giving him a lethal injection.


In the story line of The Giver, Jonas gets attached to Gabriel, a baby his family has taken home until he is permanent placed, and is horrified to discover that Gabriel, a fretful baby who has trouble sleeping through the night, will be "released," too.  Jonas makes the critical decision to escape with "Gabe" before he is terminated, even if it means leaving his family, the Community and everything he has ever known behind.

What is the entire conversation between the navel officer and Ralph in the book Lord of the Flies?

If what you are looking for is just the words spoken between the Naval officer and Ralph at the end of the story, here it is, whithout the explanatory passages:



“Hullo.”


“Hullo.”


“Are there any adults—any grown-ups with you?”


“Fun and games,” said the officer.


“We saw your smoke. What have you been doing? Having a war or something?”


“Nobody killed, I hope? Any dead bodies?”


“Only two. And they’ve gone.”


“Two? Killed?”


“We’ll take you off. How many of you are there”


“Who’s boss here?”


“I am,” said Ralph loudly.


“We saw your smoke. And you don’t know how many of you there are?”


“No, sir.”


“I should have thought,”


“I should have thought that a pack of British boys—you’re all


British, aren’t you?—would have been able to put up a better show than that—I mean—”


“It was like that at first,” said Ralph, “before things—”


“We were together then—”


The officer nodded helpfully.


“I know. Jolly good show. Like the Coral Island.”



It's very ironic, when read like this way, almost funny from a certain point of view. Here we have an island of boys that tragically and starkly mirrors the world of men, and the representative of the men talks to the representative of the boys. Both groups have been at war. The man, the Naval officer, doesn't quite get it, though. He sees it all as boys at some kind of play that ended in badly. He figures they could have done better. Ralph sees it for what it is: boys being what boys are, just small men, doing what all men eventually wind up doing. For Ralph and all the boys, it was no game, and they tried, oh they tried, but they couldn't have done any better.

In Chapter 9 of Lord of the Flies, what does Simon find when he finally reaches the beast?

After speaking with the Lord of the Flies (the pig's head on the stick) & suffering an epileptic seizure, Simon awakes and asks himself “What else is there to do?” He has had a revelation: he must come face-to-face with the beast, or live in terror forever. This decision drives him up the mountain, where he sees the dead parachutist. Here is the "beast" that so frightened Samneric, & in the corpse Simon recognizes the evil within each human. The description of his encounter is as follows:



The flies had found the figure too. The life-like movement would scare them off for a moment so that they made a dark cloud round the head. Then as the blue material of the parachute collapsed the corpulent figure would bow forward, sighing, and the flies settle once more.




Simon felt his knees smack the rock. He crawled forward and soon he understood. The tangle of lines showed him the mechanics of this parody; he examined the white nasal bones, the teeth, the colors of corruption. He saw how pitilessly the layers of rubber and canvas held together the poor body that should be rotting away. Then the wind blew again and the figure lifted, bowed, and breathed foully at him. Simon knelt on all fours and was sick till his stomach was empty. Then he took the lines in his hands; he freed them from the rocks and the figure from the wind’s indignity.



The fact that "the flies had found the figure" just as they had surrounded the pig's head leads Simon to connect the two instances in his mind. He understands that the beast is not something physical, but instead is an internal evil. The connotation of certain words in this passage ("parody", "poor body", "indignity") suggest that Simon feels sorry for this man who is as much a victim as any of the boys. Yet at the same time, he is as guilty as all of them, in that he participated in war, mush as the boys will participate in savagery & violence. Unfortunately, it is the inability to articulate this concept that will lead to Simon's death.

HOW TO SOLVE 3X= -5 THEN X= with all work shown plez,...

The first response is correct, but I thought I'd add a little bit about how I think about it just in case it's helpful.


Whenever I'm doing an algebra problem like this, where


x = something


the first thing I think about is "how can I separate x from the other numbers?" In this case in order to isolate "x" I have to figure out how to move the 3 to the other side.


Next to the x, 3 is a whole number or 3/1. But when I move it to the other side I have to change it. Like the original poster, I could call it 1/3 or I could say that it becomes the denominator (bottom number) of whatever whole number is already on that side. So it becomes:


1/3 of -5


or


1/3 x -5


or


-5/3


Sometimes I think about it in terms of "if I multiply the number on one side, then when I move it to the other side, I must divide." (inverse operation)  Or, "whatever I do to one side, I must do to the other."


For example, if you had 1/5x = 2, you would multiple both sides by 5 in order to isolate the x.


I hope that's helpful. That's how I think of it.

Friday, February 26, 2016

In Mexican Whiteboy, where was Danny's dad?

Danny is growing up in a suburb and going to a private school while he lives contentedly at home with his mother. His only problem is how to control his fast pitch so he can make the school baseball team. That summer he goes to visit relatives from his father's side of his family. During the course of the summer, Danny develops more and more questions to ask his dad. Here is a great complication, though, because Danny's Mexican dad and Caucasian mom split up, and his dad moved back to Mexico. If Danny can raise some cash, he may be able to find his dad in Mexico and learn how to tie his roots together in a bouquet.


[Below are reliable links for added information about Matt de la Pena and his writing.]

A car accelerates uniformly from rest to a speed of 21.0 km/h in 5.6 s. Find the distance the car travels during this time.Answer in units of m.

The required equation of motion


v^2-u^2=2as                      (1), where v= final velocity and u is initial vlocity , a is the uniform acceleration and s is the displacement.


v= 21kms/hr = 21000/3600=5.833333m/s


But a =(v-u)/5.6 =(5.83333-0)/5.6 = 1.0416666m/s^2


v=5.833333m/s, u=0m/s, a=0.041666m/s^2 and s is to be found out.


By sustitutin in (1), we get:


5.83333^2-0^2 = 2*1.0416666*s


5.83333^2/(2*1.1416666) =s


s= 16.3333 m is the distance travelled by the car.

What image is Robert Burns trying to put in our minds with this poem?

Towards the end of his life Robert Burns (1759-96) was engaged in the task of collecting old traditional scottish songs. In one of his letters in 1794 he states that the song "A Red, Red Rose" is "a simple old Scots song which I picked up in the country." Hence the poem is not his original composition.


Burns' poem, however, is charmingly simple and direct in its method of praising his  lover and most significantly describes how much he loves her:"As fair art, thou my bonny lass/So deep in luve I am."


He then tells her how much he loves her:



I will luve thee still, my Dear,

While the sands o'life shall run.



The implication is that he will love her forever, that is, infinity. As long as human life exists on this earth he will love her. Burns uses hyperbole, that is, exaggeration to convey to his lover the depth and intensity of his love for her. In the previous line he has told her that he will love her till all the seas dry up! But he is not satisfied with that, because he feels that there is a possibility that all the seas may indeed dry up so he says that he will love her  till all human life comes to an end on planet earth!

Two forces acting on an object produce the minimum net force if they are acting at an angle of:Multiple Choice: a) 0 degrees b) 45 degrees c) 90...

We have to deal with the additional vectorial structure called an inner product. In  this type of additional structure  each pair of vectors in the space is associated with a scalar quantity, called the inner product of the vectors.


In this case, the 2 forces are the 2 vectors above and if the 2 vectors are on the same dirrection but  the opposite sense, the angle between 2 forces will be 180degrees, so the minimum force will be reached at 180 degrees.


Explanation:


The inner product of the resultant force is


F1*F2=IF1I*IF2I*cos (F1,F2)


Wr know that the minimum value of the 


IF1I*IF2I*cos (F1,F2) is given by the minimum value of the cos (F1,F2)=-1 when the angle between F1 and F2 is 180degrees, because the rest of the product is a positive value (absolute values of the forces F1 and F2).


So the right answer is e) 180 degrees

In "Just Lather, That's All," how is the barber or Captain Torres a hero?

The barber would be a hero if he killed the captain because then it would mean that the rebels have won, but only for a short period of time. This is because the government would easily go look for another person to take over Captain Torres. However, by being a murderer would generally make the barber NOT a hero. Remember, only to his rebel friends he is a hero, and not to the whole community.


Captain Torres would be a hero in 2 ways. One would be by killing a rebel, he would reduce the number of people who oppose the government, and the Captain would be doing his job. His job is to reduce the number of rebels in the small community, so there would be less riots, and violence. Also, remember when the Captain DID NOT kill the barber, even if the barber was a rebel? Well, this would be another reason why the Captain would be a hero. Another would be that at the end of the story, the Captain mentioned that it was hard to kill too. This proved that the Captain also had a heart, and this also meant he loved the people in his community, rebel or not. But it was his job to kill rebels.




HOPED THIS HELPED!!!!!!! :D

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Is there any way that I can become as good a poet as William Shakespeare?I want to be very much like him.

I will answer this from a personal point of view as I am a poet. Firstly, good for you! There is no reason why you cannot be a writer, although most writers start off writing in their spare time as a hobby alongside a day job. One common path that has been followed by Heaney,Hughes and many others is to work in a n environment where it is possible to discuss and read. So many of them read degrees in Literature and other subjects such as Classics, History,Arts etc at universities that were notable for this (Oxford,Cambridge, Harvard and many others in the US and elsewhere and then went on to teach/professorships.) Many like Walt Whitman and O. Henry did not have that opportunity though and still made it - but you need a bread and butter job as they had.


Secondly, read poetry every single day. (I read at least two new pomes every day) You will be feeding your imagination and intelligence.Also read widely on other subjects and take a keen interest in world news and politics.


Thirdly - start now! Keep a daily journal,jot down in any poetic phrases that spring to mind when admiring nature,feeling blue or whatever - you can draw on them later. Never copy the style of other poets - many writers were first noticed for being themselves! Don't pay any attention to style, structure or techniques at all at first and don't attempt to 'build' a poem in this artificial way - that can come later when you get to university - we hope! And read,read, read, read,read.......

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Give two examples to show how the rhythm of the sentence in parts of poe's "Tell Tale Heart " is meant to imitate the beating of the heart .

Like his famous rhythmic poems, "The Bells" and "The Raven," Edgar Allan Poe uses this device to emulate the beating heart in his famed horror short story, "The Tell-Tale Heart." After the narrator kills the old man with the evil eye and buries him in pieces beneath his floor, he believes he still hears the heart beating. Poe gives the reader the ability to feel the heart beat by his rhythmic use of words in the final paragraphs.


  • I foamed—I raved—I swore! I swung the chair...

  • It grew louder—louder—louder!

  • Almighty God!—no, no! They heard!—they suspected!—they knew!—

  • now—again!—hark! louder! louder! louder! louder!

  •  I admit the deed!—tear up the planks! here, here!—

The "up, down, up, down" rhythms are consistent with that of a beating heart or a ticking clock.

In "The Crucible" Act 3, what happens when people criticize the court proceedings?

Any time anyone in the courts attempts to criticize the proceedings, the judges turn on them, and accuse them of attempting to "overthrow the courts."  Then, the person is then questioned aggressively, and often arrested.


This can be seen as Proctor, Francis and Giles attempt over and over again to save their wives and friends.  The first thing they do is present a petition that was signed by nearly 100 people attesting to the "righteous" character of some women that had been arrested as witches.  Instead of looking at the petition and realizing it as a powerful testament of the character of these women, the judges are suspicious that everyone that signed the petition was trying to undermine their authority.  Parris tells the judges,



"I think you will want to know, from each and every one of them, what discontents them with you!"



So, all the people who signed the petition are arrested for questioning.


The judges not only arrest those petitioners, but they also turn and arrest Giles Corey when he refuses to give the name of the witness that can prove Putnam is "killing his neighbors for their land."  Instead of giving credence to a very weighty claim that gets to the heart of many accusations--proof that actually relates to the cases at hand--they arrest the man giving the good evidence.


Later, as Mary Warren tries to prove the girls are frauds, they turn on her, then, they turn on Proctor as he tries to prove his case.  What can we learn here?  Don't ever try to do anything that might make what the courts have done look foolish; if you do, you will be arrested and questioned.  Just sit down, be quiet, and let them hang people.


I hope that those thoughts help a bit; good luck!

How does Lina add risk to her escape from Ember in Chapters 15-17 of The City of Ember?

In Chapters 15-17, Lina adds risk to her escape from Ember by bringing her baby sister Poppy.


When Lina and Doon discover the underground cave providing the means of escape from Ember, one of Lina's first thoughts is how she will manage to bring Poppy with her. Doon discourages the idea, however, reminding Lina that Poppy will be safe with Mrs. Murdo until the rest of the population of the city can join them. Lina concludes that she is indeed "only being selfish...to want to have (Poppy) with (her)" (Chapter 15).


When the day of their planned escape comes, however, circumstances do not turn out as Lina and Doon have planned. Instead of welcoming news of the two children's discovery and making plans to save the city, the mayor has sent his guards to pursue them, and during the Singing attended by all the citizens, there are repeated blackouts worse than any that have occurred before. In the midst of all the confusion, Lina is forced to make a precipitious decision, and she chooses to bring Poppy with her after all (Chapter 17). Although she knows that bringing a small child along on their dangerous and unknown journey will provide added risk to her and Doon, she feels that she must bring the child because she has come to realize that



"there is no safety in Ember. Not for long. Not for anyone...Whatever happens...now, it's better than what's going to happen (in Ember)" (Chapter 18).


How do the events in the final chapters of "To Kill A Mockingbird" explain the first sentence in the whole novel?Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird"

In the first sentence of "Two Kill a Mockingbird," the motif of learning experiences is introduced with the novel as Bildungsroman, or a novel of maturation.)  With the allusion to Jem's having his arm broken when he was thirteen years old and with the allusion to Dill's first giving the children the idea of making Boo Radley come out [of his house], the reader is lead through the narration of all the events leading to the attack upon Jem that caused his arm to have been broken.


From Atticus Finch's taking on the defense of the poor, innocent Tom Robinson, to the pranks of the children, then their communication with Boo in the knothole of the tree, to the trial of Tom and interrogations of Bow Ewell, the events of the last chapter all converge upon the walk home of Jem and Scout.  After Bob Ewell has tried to break into Judge Taylor's house and attempted to intimidate Hellen Robinson, there is foreshadowing of his act of revenge against Atticus.  As the children return from the school pageant, a dark figure attacks them.  As Jem and the dark figure struggle, a third figure appears; the children do not recognize him in this darkness, but it is at this point in the novel that the Tom Robinson/Bob Ewell theme comes together with the Boo Radley theme.


As Scout stands on the Radley porch, Scout has her maturing moment as she realizes the moral truth that the Radley place has no childish mystery about it at all.  The town looks the same from it as it has from her own porch.  And, with Scout's discovery that Boo is a kind person, she has developed from a little rascal to a young lady who was just escorted from her home.  She now understands her neighbor and realizes the disastrous effects which would occur by bringing Boo to trial. This maturity is measured against Atticus's mistaken conclusions about Bob Ewell and Heck Tate's view of the murder.  In actuality, Scout understands more than does Atticus about the implications of Boo Radley in the incident. Scout's growth is clearly evident at the conclusion of Harper Lee's novel.

What were the major points or characteristic of the positions between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties?During the time of...

The emergence of political parties was a critical element that arises in the administrations which follow Washington's.  In his farewell address, Washington warned against the factionalization which might emerge through political parties, but his points were not followed as two major parties grew out of the political scene at the time.  The Federalists were a party that believed in the strength of a federal government and believed that power should rest in this body.  They were the individuals who, at the Constitutional Convention, stressed that the notion of being able to exercise law and order and a level of centralized control was more important than sovereignty of the states.  Federalists were pro- business and industrial growth, and were favored by most of the wealthy at the time.  This side was placed in stark contrast to the Republicans, who believed in smaller forms of government on a more local level and also argued that agricultural expressions of the good were more advantageous to the character of America than a business model.  The freedom of states to be left alone from the federal body were of critical importance to the Republicans.


We can see this stressed in a couple of arenas.  Hamilton, being a Federalist, believed in the power and strength of a national bank as a way to offset the economic challenges faced by the new nation.  Jefferson, a Republican, went against this in his notion that a federalized bank would take from the independent autonomy of individual states.  At the same time, the belief of unifying both parties was present in Jefferson's Inauguration.  At the same time, one could see some very strong Republican elements at play.  The fact that Jefferson walked to his inauguration, as opposed to riding in an elaborate carriage, and that he stood against individuals bowing to him as deference attempted to illuminate the Republican principle of a lack of hierarchy.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Discuss the theme of childhood as presented in "Games at Twilight" by Anita Desai.

In "Games at Twilight" Anita Desai has the ability to portray childhood in all of its excitement and exhilaration, innocence, vulnerability, and even heartached.  The theme of childhood is one that encompasses all of those attributes, and is shown through the children themselves as they play a common and well-known game of hide 'n' go seek.  Childhood is exciting--you can sense the children's excitement as they are freed from the confines of the hot house and let out into the air to play.  Desai writes,



"they burst out like seeds from a crackling, overripe pod into the veranda, with such wild, maniacal yells,"



excited to be outside and free to play.  Excitement and exhilaration is also seen in Ravi as he finds an excellent spot to hide, and imagines his victory; he "shook, then shivered with delight, with self-congratulation" at his spot, and that the bully Raghu didn't find him.  Childhood is filled with innocence and vulnerability also; note the poor child that gets caught by Raghu, who ends up in tears as Raghu kicks him.  Note Ravi's happy innocent daydreaming in the garage as he awaits his triumph.  And then at the end, we see that vulnerability as his hopes are crushed, and Desai also brings in the theme of childhood heartbreak as Ravi learns a valuable grown-up lesson about his own significance:



"The ignominy of being forgotten—how could he face it? He felt his heart go heavy and ache inside him unbearably. He lay down full length on the damp grass, crushing his face into it, no longer crying, silenced by a terrible sense of his insignificance."



Childhood is filled with exhilarating moments of joy and glee, moments of vulnerability and innocence, and heartbreaking moments of difficult lessons learned, and Desai reflects all of these in her story "Games at Twilight."  I hope those thoughts helped; good luck!

What does this mean? "My love, inflame me no more, lest you consume all my wit & betray my will. Let men not censure my name..."This is a quote...

"Inflame me know more" is a way of saying one of two things. Either the speaker is addressing a second person asking them to stop inciting them to anger or asking them to stop inciting them to romantic passion. Since the context is "My love," the speaker is here asking the other person to stop doing and saying things that are romantically enticing.

"[L]est you consume all my wit" is a word play referring back to "inflame." A flame of fire consumes the things it touches (most things, except things like granite...) rendering them unrecognizable ashes. The speaker is saying that if the other persists, then "all my wit" will be reduced to ashes. Wit here means intelligence. In this context "intelligence" means that faculty by which we reason and make sound decisions: "lest you consume all my wit" means the speaker will be reduced to a feeling but unthinking and uncircumspect puddle of ashes unable to reason and choose sound decisions.

"[A]nd betray my will" is another word play, but this time playing against itself by calling up its two meanings. First, "betray my will" refers to the other willfully acting against the speakers express will: to not be inflamed. (This is what today is referred to as sexual coercion.) Second, "betray my will" refers to a self-betrayal of will. If all the speakers wit, intelligence and reasoning power, is a heap of metaphorical ashes, then, witless, the speaker cannot be true to chosen intents and convictions. Honoring our will, intentions and convictions and choices, requires our wit be in good working order. When seduced, by whatever means, away from our wit (intelligence, reasoning power) we are betrayed and we conjointly betray ourselves.

"Let men not censure my name..." refers to the fact that friends, family and society can and will reprimand and reprove, to one degree or another, those who discard intelligence and reasoning power, make emotional choices that defy logic and common sense and self-preservation, and, in so doing, betray their own desires, intentions, dreams and decisions.

Monday, February 22, 2016

Discuss The Importance of Being Earnest as a critique of Victorian society.

The Importance of Being Earnest is a critique on the morals of the British upper class, and it uses comedy to do so. For example, the usage of parody mocks the standards to which the upper class holds themselves.  The aristocracy believed in arranged marriages, unions between families to contain the wealth among the few.  Mothers sought out gentlemen of that specific upper class quality for their delicate daughters.  Wilde derides this practice, through the banter between Lady Bracknell, Gwendolyn's mother, and Jack Worthing, Gwendolyn's suitor.  Lady Bracknell asks a number of questions that she believes are vital for a good husband for her daughter: what is his income, how old is he, where does he live, what are his politics (Act I).  The most important question, however, is who is his family, because the family name is what is important in a lasting marriage among the upper class.  Wilde, however, parodies the situation, as Jack does not have a family (not a sign of misfortune, but of carelessness), but a bag (Act I). Found by the late Mr. Thomas Cardew on the Brighton Line, Jack came from a "somewhat large, black leather handbag, with handles on it," instead of having parents (Act I).  Lady Bracknell tells him to produce a parent, of either sex, because her delicate daughter will not "marry into a cloakroom, and form an alliance with a parcel" (Act I).   Through the parody, Wilde criticizes the process of finding suitable husbands, the parading and careful selection by mother hens for their young.  Cecily, Jack's ward, herself inadvertently mocks the institution of marriage, fancifully creating a fictional storyline based off of the novels of the period.  In her diary, she writes of her engagement to Ernest, after several breakups and her own purchase of a ring for him to give her, because that is expected in a romance (Act II).  Wilde, through Cecily's formulated engagement, critiques the triviality of the upper class, that instead of practicing German or learning about economics, the upper class squanders away their time dreaming.  During this time period, Great Britain was a manufacturing giant, extorting the labor of the poor factory workers. Although unmentioned in the play, the absurdity of Cecily's concoctions sharply contrasts the realities of the period.    

Do you agree with the Native that argument that supports immigrants should not be allowed in the US?

This question is not very clearly worded, so I'm not sure what you are really asking, but I'll give it a shot.


First of all, I don't agree that immigration should be completely closed off.  Legal immigration provides us with a lot of motivated people who come here and contribute to our economy in many ways.  Also, bringing people in from other countries contributes to our ability as a people to identify with and understand the viewpoints of other countries.


However, it is also easy to see the downsides of immigration.  A homogeneous society is one that can be more cohesive.  When we all speak the same language and have the same culture, it is easier for us to identify with one another.  Having a melting pot society makes for more social tension than we would otherwise have.


If this answer is not in line with what you need, please restate your question.

Sunday, February 21, 2016

What is Government of National Unity

The term "government of national unity" is a term used to refer to a case in which all the major political parties in a country are part of the governing coalition.  This type of government occurs in parliamentary systems.


An example of this would be if the two major parties of England combined to form a government.  Right now, the Tories are in opposition while Labour is in government.  In a national unity government, ministers from each party would be included in the cabinet.


Another term for this is a "grand coalition" government.

Saturday, February 20, 2016

How does the characterization of the District Attorney and John and Mini's relationship reflect the mores of 1916?

A key word you need to focus on in this play is patriarchy. What I mean by this is this play explores the relationships between men and women at this particular point in history. You will want to focus on how the relationships between Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale and then the men are presented, and in particular the assumptions that are made by the men about the women.


Focussing on the relationship between John and Minnie Wright, look closely at how Mrs. Hale describes Minnie before her marriage with John:



She used to wear pretty clothes and be lively when she was Minnie Foster, one of the town girls singing int he choir. But that - oh, that was thirty years ago.



Then later she says:



She - come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself - real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and - fluttery. How - she - did - change.



Notice how the dashes in the last sentence really emphasises the pity and shock felt at the transformation of Minnie. Mrs. Hale presents a picture of a kind, lovely and sensitive woman who is then oppressed and constricted by her marriage to John Wright, who Mrs. Hale describes as being "close" and says:



But he was a hard man, Mrs. Peters. Just to pass the time of day with him. (Shivers) Like a raw wind that gets to the bone.



The assumption that John Wright killed the bird, who, as established above, can be said to symbolically represent Minnie, shows us the reality of their marriage. Minnie's personality was crushed and strangled by John Wright - she wasn't allowed to go out at all, and he didn't let her buy any nice clothes. This allows Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters to piece together the motive for the crime, that they then hide from the menfolk in a moving act of solidarity with Mrs. Wright.


Hope this helps to give you a few ideas to get started!

How does the plot conflict drive the story?who are the antagonist and protagonist in the story?

I would say that the protagonist in the story is Charlotte the spider while the antagonist is the farmer, Homer Zuckerman.


The conflict between them is that Homer wants to kill Wilbur while Charlotte is going to do her best to keep him alive with her web writings that extol his virtues.


The plot is driven by this conflict because the main plot line follows Charlotte's efforts to keep Wilbur from being killed.  These efforts continue up to the time when he is brought to the fair and wins the prize, thus ensuring his survival.  At that point, Charlotte's work is done and she can die in peace.

Friday, February 19, 2016

What historical source might Shakespeare be using as a reference for Hamlet?

Shakespeare's source for Hamlet is generally accept to have been Thomas Kyd's translation of an old Norse legend that first appeared in the French language in Paris in the 1500s, later appearing in English in 1608. No extant copies exist of Kyd's translation of the Norse tale, but it is called Ur-Hamlet ("ur" means "original). Very little is known of Kyd's work except that it was a tragedy that was performed in London and a character named Hamlet saw a ghost that cried "Hamlet, revenge!"

The old Norse legend was written by Saxo Grammaticus and told the story of the rulers of Denmark. It was called Gesta Danorum, which translates as History of the Danes. The story about the Hamlet prototype is in Books 3 and 4. In Saxo's legend, the King is Rorik. He marries Garuth and they have a son called Amleth. Rorik's brother kills him so he can marry Garuth and become King. Amleth fears for his life and pretends to be mad. He plans revenge, which succeeds, and he becomes the rightful King.

A piece of wood is floating in a bathtub. A second piece of wood sits on top of the first piece, and does not touch the water.If the top piece is...

The total volume of water displaced by a set of one or more objects, floating on water is has a mass equal to the mass of all the objects in the set. It does not matter if the objects are placed one over the other, or if they float separately. In the situation explained in the question, the total weight of the two pieces of wood does not change when instead of being placed on top of each other they are placed separately in the bath tub. Therefore there will be no change in the volume of water displaced, and accordingly no change in the level of water in the bathtub.


Thus option C) is correct.

I didn't understand why the government controlled the children's age. And at the end, what happened to the Giver - did he die and if so, how?In...

At the same time each year, the Community decreed any child born during the course of that year as being "one year old," whether born January or December!  This collective birthday celebration did away with the sense of individualism to favour one's identification with the group instead. This corresponded with the value system of the Community and was coherent with other rules as well.


In the end the Giver arranged with Jonas to make it look as if he had drowned in the river. Things got complicated, though, since Jonas learned at the last minute that Gabriel would be "released" the very next day and decided to take him along as well. The reader can only suppose that the Giver nevertheless stuck to this version of the story as an explanation which would be satisfactory to the other Community members once Jonas was gone.


Lowry does not hint at all that the Giver was punished or died as a result of Jonas' escape. In her following book 'Gathering Blue,' she shows Jonas as the leader of another community, but there is no reference at all to his first one, nor is there any mention of it in the next book 'The Messanger.' There is certainly enough "unfinished business"  left over from 'The Giver' and the other two novels to write an intriguing sequel involving all three.

How does the work ethic of the Puritans affect Kit, and help her grow in The Witch of Blackbird Pond?

One of the really interesting historical aspects of this novel is the way that the author describes the hard work that life involved in those days just to survive. For Kit especially, arriving from Barbados where she had her own maid and had to do none of this work, it comes as a real revelation to her to see how her aunt and cousins live and the monotonous tasks and physical labour that they, of necessity, must engage in. In a sense, we as readers are placed in the same position as Kit, as we come to realise how hard life was back then and how much hard work it involved. Consider the following quote:



By the end of that first day the word useful had taken on an alarming meaning. Work in that household never ceased, and it called for skill and patience, qualities Kit did not seem to possess. There was meat to be chopped, and vegetables to prepare for the mid-day meal. The pewter mugs had to be scoured with reeds and fine sand. There was a great kettle of soap boiling over a fire just behind the house, and all day long Judith and her mother took turns stirring it with a long stick.



At first, Kit shows herself to be incredibly inept in all of these tasks, yet gradually, bit by bit, she learns to master them and begins to learn the much bigger and harder lesson of patience, which was essential to all of these smaller tasks. Thus Kit begins to see the value of hard work and above all learns the patience that is necessary to do these jobs well.

Need your help. Fractions. x-1/y / y-1/x this is a fraction one of these answers must be correct a. x/y; b.y/x; c.1; d.-1 e.-x/y

The answer depends upon how you group it. A typical grouping or putting bracket is as below:


(x-1/y)/(y-1/x)=[(xy-1)/y]   /    {(xy-1)/x}


=x/y, as (xy-1) gets cancelled. So a is the choice. But I do not agree with this as this is a forced answer as I did my own way of grouping or braketing which is not permissible.


If I choose  to put the brackets like: {x-[1/(y/y)-1]}/x , then the answer is {x-0}/x=1, Now it seems the choice at c is O.K.


But strictly under the rules of operations of maths,  in an expression like:  x-1/y/y-1/x , there is no choice  for us of grouping or braketing arbitrarily .You may say that you have written like:


x-1/y   /   y-1/xy . But space is not relevant operation in maths and does not affect the priority of operations.Mathematics has its own strict rules and priority of operations according to which we have to simplify:


Here, x  is the first term.


- is an operation as well as a connector between the first and the second term.


1/y/y  is the 2nd term which means  (1/y) divided by y and the result is 1/y^2. There are 2 divisions of equal priority and so you should do first the division on the left and then on the result operate the second division.


- is an operation and a connector between the second and third term.


1/x is the 3rd term .


Therefore the correct answer is (x)-(1/y^2)-(1/x) = {(x^2-1)/x}-{1/y^2}. Unfortunately no answer is correct.


Test: Take x=20 and y = 5 in the above expression and feed to your computer  or a  scientic calculator which process strictly according to the priority rules of operations of maths and see the result:


So the value of the expression x-1/y/y-1/x for x=20 and y=10 is 20-1/10/10-1/20 =19.94   by Ms Exel or a scientific Calculator.


20-1/10^2-1/20 =20-0.01-0.05=19.99-0.05=19.94.


But according to the choice given


a) x/y=20/10=2


b)y/x=10/20


c)1 and


d)-1


e)-x/y= -20/10=-2


Thus none of the choices is correct.

What is the relation of story to plot and the construction of narrating perspective for "The Red headed league"?

The story "The Red Headed League" is a Sherlock Holmes mystery.  The plot involves one of Holmes' famous challenges in trying to ascertain why a red-headed man was hired to copy the Encyclopedia Britannica for four hours a day, for a decent amount of money, and then closed out of his place of work without explanation.


The construction of the narrating perspective is necessary for the development of the story's plot.  Sir Arthur Conan Doyle uses this structure to build up the suspense in the story.  The story is narrated by Holmes' less-that-adept sidekick, Dr. Watson.  He is a foil for the character of Holmes.  Watson is not nearly as intelligent as Holmes is made out to be.  His average intelligences allows for Holmes to be even more amazing, as he picks up on details that Watson misses, and draws conclusions that never occur to Watson.


This structure also allows for the mounting suspense.  The narrative at the beginning of the story is sedate.  The premise of the story is displayed cleanly, and the plot's movement is very slow.  As Watson describes Holmes' studious introspection, coupled suddenly with his unexpected, rapid but "silent" epiphanies (which are not revealed to the audience/Watson), the tension mounts quickly.


By the time Holmes starts to put the pieces into play, the plot is galloping along, and though the reader is not privy to the smaller details, large pieces are brought into play to lead the reader along to the climax of the story.


It is in the falling action and resolution of the plot that the reader is finally given the details that hold all the larger pieces together, while also once again lifting Holmes and his superior intellect up to closer and awe-inspiring inspection by the reader.


It is formula writing that is very specifically associated with Conan Doyle's writing style, which made him very popular in his day and still draws fans so many years later.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

In the story, "The Minister's Black Veil", how does the world outside the town react to the veil?

Very interesting question. It is clear that the black veil has both a positive and a negative impact on Mr. Hooper. We are told how the black veil distances him from his own village, and of course, especially his betrothed, Elizabeth, who breaks the engagement. However, it also has the "bonus" if such a term can be used of making him successful as a minister - a "very efficient clergyman", as the text puts it. The text states:



Strangers came long distances to attend service at his church, with the mere idle purpose of gazing at his figure, because it was forbidden them to behold his face. But many were made to quake ere they departed!



So it is clear that the veil makes him a novelty, but one which people are forced to take seriously, for the black veil strikes terror into visitors' hearts as well.


Note too, how the text says:



As the years wore on, shedding their snows above his sable veil, he acquired a name throughout the New England churches, and they called him Father Hooper.



The black veil therefore allows Mr. Hooper to really have an impact as a minister because of his "mysterious emblem", making him a "man of awesome power" and gaining many converts.

What does Nietzsche mean by saying, "We love someone but we never think about them"?When Nietzsche said, "We love someone but we never think about...

Nietzsche meant that the act of loving is transparent and needs no proof or claim. Nietzsche believed all knowledge was falsification. He believed that "thought" was always self-serving and came from the ego, sort of like we own our thoughts.He also believed that abstract concepts are objectified by poeple. A good quote supporting his theories is:


"Philosophy always creates the world in its own image; it cannot do otherwise"


Since Nietzche believed all these things, he thought of love as an act and something that cannot be conceptualised or even thought about in a pure and reliable way. That is why he wrote ,"we love someone but we never think of them."

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

When Bob Cratchit arrives at work a few minutes late the day after Christmas, how does Scrooge have some fun at the clerk's expense? can u please...

At this point in the novella, Scrooge is a completely changed man, but Cratchit doesn't know it, so Scrooge plans on playing a joke on Cratchit. When Cratchit sneaks into the office a whole "eighteen minutes and a half" late, Scrooge growls at him in his usual manner and scolds him for being so late, and then he leaps off his stool and gives Cratchit "such a dig in the waistcoat that he staggered back into the Tank again."


At this point, just when Cratchit fears that Scrooge is going to fire him, Scrooge states "therefore I am about to raise your salary." Cratchit can't believe his own ears, for he



trembled, and got a little nearer to the ruler. He had a momentary idea of knocking Scrooge down with it; holding him; and calling to the people in the court for help and a strait-waistcoat.



What a shocking surprise Scrooge's statement is to Cratchit; he believes Scrooge has gone insane, and to further shock Cratchit, Scrooge says "A merry Christmas, Bob!" and states that he will "endeavour to assist [his] struggling family" and then he instructs him to "buy another coal-scuttle" before he gets to work.


Wow! Can you imagine what Cratchit must have been thinking.

The sum of two numbers is 16. The sum of their squares is a minimum. Determine the numbers.

Since the sum of the two numbers is 16, we can always the write the two numbers, like, x and 16-x  or 8+h and 8-h, etc.


If you choose x and 16-x, then the sum of the squares , s = x^2+(16-x)^2 and  the solution of ds/dx = 0 which makes d2S/dx positive is the minimum.


But ds/dx =[ (x^2+(16-x)^2]' = 0 gives:2x+2(16-x)(-2) = 0 gives: 4x=32 or x=8.  The two numbers are 8 and 8 .If you want the two numbers to be different, choose the numbers such that 8+h and 8-h, where h is any arbitrarily small depending upon your accuracy.


For integral solution, choose h =1, then 8+1 =9 and 8-1 =7 are the solutions.


For the accuracy to the level of 1st decimal, 8+*1=8.1 and 8-0.1 =7.9 are the solution, For the level of 2nd decimal accuracy, 8+0.01=8.01 and 8-0.01 = 7.99 are the solutions.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Why did Theodore Roosevelt have to proceed with caution on pushing for reforms in his first term?Isn't it because the congress was on his tail,...

There are a couple of main reasons why Theodore Roosevelt couldn't be more aggressive in his first term.


First, he hadn't been elected president but had been William McKinley's vice president.  He had been put there partly because Republican party bosses wanted him out of the way because they didn't really like him.  So in that sense, yes, Congress was on him because they didn't really trust him


Second, TR was the first of the Progressive presidents after a long period in which presidents were not expected to do much.  So it wasn't clear what role the national government and the president should play in the reform/progressive movement.

Saturday, February 13, 2016

In the end of "The Overcoat," why does the corpse float around stealing coats? Why would the author conclude a realistic story in this way?

In answer to your first question, the corpse (or ghost) of Akaky floats around stealing overcoats because, at first glance, the limited scope of his existence for a short time takes on new life because he gets a new overcoat.  More than this, however, may be his spirit's desire for justice--if not for himself, then for others.


As a man of limited funds, the need for a new overcoat upset Akaky greatly.  He had no money.  Already he pinched each ruble he earned as tightly as possible.  However, as the bitterly cold Russian weather arrived, Akaky felt the cold more acutely.  When his old coat was held up to the light, the cloth was almost transparent.  When he realized he had no choice, he became even more frugal.  He used no candles after sunset and even went without eating at times.


For months, Akaky dreamed of the coat. He visited a shop with the tailor to select the cloth.  The idea of the coat became, as the narrator writes, like a companion to him.  His anticipation grew until he thought of little else.


When the material was finally bought, the tailor did a wonderful job sewing the coat. Akaky was overjoyed.  His fellow clerks at the office where he worked, who had in the past been so insulting toward him, were thrilled by his good fortune.  They made a great fuss, and even invited him to celebrate with them that night.


With one new overcoat, Akaky's existence, even the way he perceived himself, radically changed.  He decided to join his coworkers, quite out of character for this fifty-year old man, whose only passion for so many years had been his work.  Unfortunately, even as his existence had been so dramatically altered for the better, too soon tragedy struck. On his way home from the party, he was robbed of his coat. Akaky was devastated. It is as if some part of him died.


Akaky turned to the authorities for help, but all ignored him. When he uncharacteristically spoke up for himself with the last official (the Person of Consequence), the man--rather than helping Akaky--berated him simply to impress an old friend.  Akaky was mortified to have been treated so harshly and collapsed.


When he got home, Akaky became very ill.  In a matter of days he died, leaving no family--and no impression upon the world that he had ever lived. (And perhaps he never had truly lived.)


However, the importance of that overcoat, perhaps because it somehow validated Akaky's very existence, took on a life of its own.  Almost as if to right the wrong done to him, Akaky's "corpse" started haunting the area, robbing others of their coats.  Arguably, at this point the coat was no longer as important as the way he was treated by the Person of Consequence.  The man, who should have helped him in an official capacity, not only did nothing, but also took advantage of his position at Akaky's expense.


There was the need for Akaky to settle a debt, but not for the coat itself.  Had it been about a coat, certainly his theft of the first coat would have been sufficient.  It was not until Akaky's spirit/corpse encountered the Person of Consequence and stole his coat that the thievery stopped.


It may well have been not that Akaky took that particular coat, but that his appearance to the man changed the Person of Consequence's behavior toward others. He began to use his powerful position more wisely and compassionately.  At this point, Akaky had finally left his mark on the world quietly (as was his way) in a most unlikely and unexpected manner.

Why should America continue to allow immigration?

It is true that America is a nation formed from immigrants.  But, if one studies the history of Ellis Island, New York, one learns that not everyone who came to America was allowed to stay.  People who had medical conditions, who were criminal, etc. were deported almost as fast as they arrived. (The pejorative term for Italians--WOP--comes from so many of their "Being Without Papers," the proper documents, to allow them to enter the United States.)


In addition to a conditional entry, no immigrant was entitled to anything who was not a citizen.  If he/she were not a citizen, he/she was termed "illegal immigrant" and was deported.  This deportation of illegal aliens was standard procedure in the early twentieth century.


Finally, the immigrants who came from Western and Eastern Europe at the turn of the twentieth century, worked and paid taxes and learned English. (They were on no welfare programs.)  Many of their children, in fact, refused to speak the native language in the home, insisting to their parents that they were "Americans," not Polish, or Italian, or Swedes, etc.


Nowadays, the majority of immigrants who come to the United States are greatly different from the immigrants of Ellis Island.  They come from third-world countries--not Europe--they can arrive carrying disease (leprosy, tuberculosis) that had been eradicated from the U.S. and remain; they are from countries who pose terrorist threats to the United States, many are of criminal backgrounds, and a high percentage of them do not contribute to the economy, for they either collect welfare benefits such as free hospitalization, schooling, food stamps, etc. Or, if they work, they often take the maximum tax deduction so that little comes out of their paycheck.  Much of their money is sent back "home" to family.  Then, after a year many leave and pay no income tax at the end of the year, either.  Effort to assimilate into the American culture is not often apparent.  Immigrants do not attend ESL classes to learn English.  Also, for example, they frequent churches, stores, even hospitals and clinics that cater to their native tongue.  Even car dealerships and retail stores accommodate them.  So, because there is no need to become an American, they do not.  Millions are illegal immigrants--an estimated 14-20 million--who simply use America for their needs.  (Witness the devastation of the economy of California that illegal immigrants have made, an economy that was once the fifth largest in the world, standing alone.)


With the unemployment rate at the dizzying level that it is, it is not unreasonable to wonder why more people should enter the country.  While the Japanese are having fewer children, there are many, many people in this country who are reproducing rapidly and the population is increasing.  That some of them are not inclined to work, and that many are ill-equipped and uneducated is also a fact.  But, there is no shortage of able-bodied people in this country.  Besides, most of the manufacturing is no longer conducted in this country. There is no logical reason to continue immigration.

What made Buck's first day at Dyea so terrifying in Call of the Wild?

Buck has been thrust in a world which is totally alien to the one he is used to, which is what makes his first day at Dyea so terrifying.  Having grown up on Judge Miller's place in California's Santa Clara Valley, he has lived an idyllic life, eminently civilized, where all he has had to do each day if he so desired was lie around in the sun.  When he arrives at Dyea after his kidnapping,



"every hour (is) filled with shock and surprise.  He (has) been suddenly jerked from the heart of civilization and flung into the heart of things primordial...here (is) neither peace, nor rest, nor a moment's safety.  All (is) confusion and action, and every moment life and limb (are) in peril".



Buck, whose only previous canine companions have essentially been house dogs, finds that there is now "imperative need to be constantly alert", for the dogs among whom he finds himself here in Dyea are "savages...who (know) no law but the law of club and fang".  Buck realizes this reality immediately and in a grizzly manner, when he witnesses the team attack Curly, one of their own, and rip her to pieces within minutes.  In this new world, there is "no fair play...once down, that (is) the end of you".


A second adjustment Buck must quickly make is to his treatment by the humans in his life.  Upon arrival at Dyea beach, he is unceremoniously fastened into "an arrangement of straps and buckles" and set to work like a draught animal.  His master is "stern, demanding instant obedience, and by virtue of his whip receiving instant obedience", and Buck instinctively understands that to rebel would be futile (Chapter 2).

Why were the main cities of Britain bombed by Germany in the 1940-1941?

The bombing of Britain was carried out for two reasons.  The first was to destroy military capabilities, communications centers, rail lines and industrial capacity, and thus strike against the ability of Great Britain to maintain governmental and military cohesion and the capacity to wage modern industry-based warfare.  The second reason was to terrorize the population. Although much rhetoric has been spouted throughout history about war being waged on soldiers and not civilians, the truth is that from earliest human history the general population has always been considered a legitimate target of war.


London, of course, was the main target, but Liverpool as the main port city of the west coast was also a major target throughout the war.  Most port cities and industrial centers were heavily attacked, including Manchester, Newcastle, Edinburgh, Dundee, Glasgow and the Northern Irish shipbuilding center of Belfast.  The rest of Ireland was not bombed by the Germans, as the Republic of Eire was a neutral country.  Leeds, Sheffield, Coventry and Birmingham were also heavily attacked, some 554 persons killed in a single 1940 raid on Coventry.  In September of 1940 over 13,000 were killed in London alone.  Nearly 30,000 Londoners were killed during the war in German bombing raids.  Nearly every city of any consequence at all in Britain was bombed.


Ironically enough, it was Britain which initiated what was termed "city-bombing", striking targets inside Germany on the night May 11, 1940.  Although British policy stated officially that such bombing was "absolutely contrary to international law," Britain bombed Berlin with a force of 81 bombers August 25, 1940, and after five further raids the Germans began their "blitz" some three weeks later.  However, the Germans had initiated bombing of civilian centers during the Spanish Civil War in 1936 at Guernica, the subject of a famous painting by Picasso.  The practice of aerial bombardment of civilians was first begun by the Red Army during the Russian Civil War immediately following WW I.


The heaviest losses of life from aerial bombardment during the Second World War were among civilians, in the fire bombing by the Allies of Dresden, Germany, and the fire bombing of Tokyo, Japan by American forces.  The fires in Tokyo killed some 130,000 persons in one raid, about the same casualty number as the Dresden bombing, and more than those killed in the atomic bombings.

Friday, February 12, 2016

Who is speaking?

In Burns’s poem, a gentleman is speaking to a female (his lass). The first stanza is a brief general statement to whoever may be near, including the speaker’s lass herself. In stanza two, and in the remainder of the poem, the speaker addresses the lass directly, explaining to her that even though he must travel, she will always be foremost in his thoughts because he attributes to her the beauty of both flowers and music. The speaker asserts that seas must dry and rocks must melt before his love will end. These are both figures of overstatement, and they suggest a strong commitment. More serious as a figure is the metaphor of the “sands o’ life,” which compares life to an hourglass that will eventually run out of sand. Though the concluding metaphor of lengthy travel (we might remember that at the time a trip of ten thousand miles might have taken three or four years) is also hyperbolic, the sands metaphor suggests that the speaker, underneath his exaggerations, is not without his serious side.

Covalent compound?Properties of covalent compound?

A covalent compound is a compound in which the atoms that are bonded share electrons rather than transfer electrons from one to the other.


The reason that nonmetals have to share electrons with each other has to do with electronegativity.  Recall that electronegativity is a measure of how much an element pulls electrons away from other elements it is bonded to.  Metals generally have very low electronegativities (they don't much want to grab electrons) while nonmetals have high electronegativities (they really want to grab electrons).  The reason for this trend is the octet rule, which says that all elements want to have the same number of electrons as the nearest noble gas, because noble gases are unusually stable.  When metals bond to nonmetals, ionic compounds are formed because the metal atoms don't want electrons and easily give them to nonmetals that do want electrons.

Thursday, February 11, 2016

What is Of Mice and Men all about?

"Of Mice and Men" is a book about two men who live during the depression era.  One man, George is small and intelligent.  The other man, Lenny, is feeble minded but is loyal to George.  They grew up together and George promised that he would take care of Lenny.  He has accepted the responsibility for Lenny.  However, he indicates some frustration in his responsibility.



“I could live so easy and maybe have a girl” (7).



In the beginning of the book they have to leave town and find another job because Lenny had assaulted a girl.  They come to an area where George establishes a plan that if anything goes wrong they will meet.  They get jobs as ranch hands.


Lennie has been keeping a pet mouse in his pocket which he rubs.  He does not understand death.  He also is a large strong man who does not comprehend the danger of his own strength. At the ranch Lenny becomes the victim of the owner's son Curley.  He is a bully.  Lenny accidentally breaks Curley's arm when they engage in a fight started by Curley.


Lenny befriends a man named Candy.  He is an old washed up ranchman who ahs a mangled arm.  He has given up his dreams.  Lenny tells him that he and George are saving their money to buy a farm.  He is going to raise rabbits.  Candy is excited and agrees to contribute his savings to the ranch so he can live there.


Curley has a wife.  He is very jealous of her.  Lenny is given a puppy by Slim the head ranch hand.  He loves to pet smalls things and accidentally kills it.  Curley's wife comes in and he pets her hair.  He gets too rough and she starts to scream.  Lenny accidentally breaks her neck. He runs to hide at the designated place.


George and the ranchers find Curley's wife.  George knows they will kill Lenny.  He goes ahead of them and finds Lenny.  While talking to him about the ranch he shoots him in the head.  He has killed his friend to protect him so the others will not harm him.

How does the title of the play work as symbol and how does it reflect the role of women in society?

A doll is not a real person, it has no brain,living body,personality,identity or role other than a thing to be played with, to amuse, to entertain and discard when no longer interesting. In suggesting that Nora is in some kind of 'doll's house' Ibsen is also suggesting that she is an artificial creation with no autonomy and can only exist in an artifical world created specially for her. In some cases, in Ibsen's society and time (and our own at times) this was true. Women were idolized if they were from a wealthy family and pretty, for their beauty and charm, but given no means to further their own learning,training or independence in order to forge a career where they could stand on their own two feet. Under the guise of protecting women (who had been made deliberately dependent) society trapped them first by marriage and their role as 'wife' and then by child-bearing and their role as 'mother.' Many audiences just couldn't take Nora's walking out on this role. Some brave and ground-breaking women did break out to write novels or get involved in politics later on such as the Pankhursts but these were few and far between. The daily grind kept most women in the roles that had been created for them - in the doll's houses they lived in if they were lucky. If not they lived in 'doll's rooms' in poor areas of tenements but the role or lack of it was the same.Here is a history link to how some of these things began to change due to the bravery of some women breaking out of their 'doll house ' roles:

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

How is Feste able to win over Olivia? How would you track his train of thought in their conversation?

In William Shakespeare’s play "The Twelfth Night" the play is a pun of fools who torment their adversary the killjoy Malvolio. Through-out the play the fools engage in mischief. Feste is Olivia's jester.


I have to agree with the previous writer that the only place in the play where I can see Feste winning over Olivia is when she tells him to go away. Feste argues with her that he is a good fool. Olivia denies this saying he is basically dull. Feste says that drink will make him more witty. He then makes a witty comment. Oliva asks Malvolio his opinion and the man puts Feste down. Olivia defends Feste and tells Malvolio that he instead is



"Oh, you are sick of self-love, Malvolio, and taste with a distempered "


I would have to say that Feste wins Olivia over with his sense of humor and by winning her support and defence from Malvolilo.


For mercury to expand from 4.0 cm^3 to 4.1 cm^3, what change in temperature is necessary?Mercury has a volume expansion coefficient of 180x10^-6/C...

The extent of expansion in volume due to increase in temperature ids given by the formula:


v2 - v1 = v1*(t2 - t1)*E


Where:


v1 = initial volume = 4 cm^3 (Given)


v2 = Final volume = 4.1 cm^3 (Given)


t1 = Initial temperature


t2 = Final temperature


E = Volume expansion coefficient = 180*10^(-6)/degree C (Given)


Substituting these values in the above equation we get:


4.1 - 4 = 4*(t2 - t1)*[180*10^(-6)


Therefore: 0.1 = (t2 - t1)*[72*10^(-5)]


Therefore: t2 - t1 =  0.1/[72*10^(-5)] =138.88 degrees C


Rounding this off to nearest whole number:


t2 - t1 = 139 degrees C


Therefore change in temperature necessary for expansion is 139 degrees C.


Thus the option B) is correct.

In bean seeds the food store contains an insoluble carbohydrate. The seedling uses the food store for growth. Name the carbohydrate present in...

Plant seeds store glucose, a carbohydrate, as the polysaccharide starch. Starch can be separated into two fractions--amylose and amylopectin. Natural starches are mixtures of amylose (10-20%) and amylopectin (80-90%).Amylose forms a colloidal suspension in hot water; amylopectin is completely insoluble.


Seedlings use the starch as an energy source for growth until the plant is big and complex enough to photosynthesize.

How would you describe Daisy’s state of mind during dinner? What does she say and so that helps reveal her inner conflicts?

I'd describe her state of mind as troubled, stuck in a bad marriage (now really stuck with a baby) and maybe in a kind of mid-life crisis. If you're referring to dinner in the first chapter, Daisy is initially over-the-top which reveals she's acting; or, considering she's dealing with Tom's infidelity, she may just be happy to see an old familiar face (Nick).


"I'm p-paralyzed with happiness." (13)


Daisy later compares Nick to a rose, and he interprets it this way:



This was untrue. I am not even faintly like a rose. She was only extemporizing, but a stirring warmth flowed from her, as if her heart was trying to come out to you concealed in one of those breathless, thrilling words. (18)



Daisy storms out. When she comes back, there is no hidden subtlety. She says she's had a rough time and she's cynical about everything. Then she says something that implies the idea that everyone (at least in her circle) thinks things are bad.



You see I think everything's terrible anyhow, she went on in a convinced way. "Everybody thinks so-the most advanced people. And I know. I've been everywhere and seen everything and done everything."



Nick interprets this as a mask for what is really troubling her: namely, Tom's infidelity and I always thought she was sorry she married Tom for other reasons: his glory was done (a former athlete) and he filled that void with women and his own racist view of sociology which made him feel intelligent.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

In Monster by Walter Dean Myers, what does Briggs say exactly in his closing agrument?I need this question answered before Wednesday !!!!

I know that this is well past your deadline, but I feel the answer is needed for other people who may be looking.


Briggs states that the State failed to bring forward any witnesses to the actual murder itself.  Instead, they were only able to produce Miss Henry who failed to identify King from mug shots.  It was only when she picked him out from a line-up that she was able to recognize him.


Briggs also states that Mr. Evans, in order to make a deal, had to place the blame on someone and choose King. Briggs goes on to say that Mrs. Moore is not a reliable witness because she is related to King and would, therefore, lie for him. Briggs then states that Cruz is simply trying to get himself away from the trial and persons involved.


In the end, Briggs states that the prosecution has provided no reliable evidence against King and that he should, therefore, be found not guilty.

Which aspects of human nature does Swift find unfortunate or regrettable?

Essentially, Swift thought all of human nature as deplorable. Swift was a believer in the Protestant idea that man is by nature sinful, having fallen from the Garden of Eden. He believed that while man is rational, this rationality does not necessarily lead to good. Therefore, one should not consider rationality the greatest human quality. Swift felt it was human nature to sin: to be deceitful, cruel, selfish, materialistic, vain, foolish, and otherwise flawed. For him, rationality and institutions such as governments, churches, and social structures exist solely to control man's tendency to sin, to keep him in line.


These beliefs are evident throughout Gulliver's Travels. For example, Gulliver meets his physical and moral inferiors in the Lilliputians, and sees that they have well-thought-out but illogical and even unethical ideas about justice, schooling children, and choosing political leaders. On the contrary, his physical and moral superiors, the Brobdingnagians, do not suffer war or strife because their political and social structures are far superior to England's. In the novel, Gulliver encounters societies that ridicule the human condition, either by mocking it or imitating it. Yet there is no suggestion of how we can make it right again, or how we can overcome our nature. Swift suggests that we can never return to that state of perfection in the idyllic garden because it is the human condition to sin, but we can at least rise above our Yahoo-ness.


One aspect that Swift particularly focused on in his satire was politics. Swift chose to ridicule the worst aspects of politics in Gulliver's Travels. Most of this is found in Part I, which mirrors the events in England in Swift's day. The petty Lilliputian emperor represents the worst kind of governor, pompous and too easily influenced by his counselors' selfish ambitions. Swift also explores the duties and purpose of government in Parts I, II, and IV. By having Gulliver discuss his system of government and compare it to the ones he discovers, Swift raises questions about government's role in public education, provisions for the poor, and distribution of wealth. Part of what makes Gulliver's Travels so provocative and timely even today is that Swift doesn't provide simplistic answers to these questions. He shows that human natuer is complicated, and that we all demonstrate the best and worst of humanity at times.

In To Kill a Mockingbird when Scout tries to spare Walter Cunningham any further humiliation, what does Miss Caroline do to her?

This scene in Chapter 2 is another example of Scout's outspokenness and naivety, Miss Caroline's inexperience, and Walter Cunningham's pride.


When Miss Caroline continues to try to force Walter to take lunch money, Scout finally steps in (at the request of another student in the class) and explains that even though Walter might be a poor Cunningham, he doesn't take anything from anybody.  Miss Caroline does not appreciate this because she is now embarrassed that she humiliated one of her students and so



"she stood stock still, then grabbed [Scout] by the collar and hauled [her] back to her desk" (21).



She then smacks Scout on the hand with a ruler and makes her stand in the corner.

Towards the end of the story, what does the speaker want the raven to do in the short story "The Raven," by Edgar Allan Poe?

On the fast track to madness due to the loss of his lover Lenore, the speaker in Edgar Allan Poe's poem "The Raven" would like nothing more than for the raven to give him good news about her return. When he asks the bird if he and Lenore will be reunited in Heaven, it accordingly responds "Nevermore!" Unhappy at the response, the reader demands that the raven leave him alone and get back to the "Plutonian shore" (return to the Devil). However, the bird refuses to leave, again remarking "Nevermore!" and continues "still sitting" on its perch on the bust of Pallas above the chamber door.

What are the functions of unhappiness in Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett? Why? Give evidence.If you can present qoutes or incidents of where...

All of Beckett's work and Waiting for Godot very much presents us an image contrary to our mirror fascination with false self-sustaining images of the ego. Beckett directs our laughter in an inward way and brings it in upon us. His laughter is that which makes us laugh at ourselves. At the face of a world where an overdetermination of meaning has already led to its cancellation, Beckett looks at the ridiculous, the sardonically funny side of human unhappiness in a Sadian and Aartaudian vein of cruelty and self-erasure. As the line goes in Endgame, there is nothing funnier than unhappiness. That is the essence of Beckett's tragi-comedy.


Unhappiness is the present of Didi and Gogo while there was some happiness in the past, in their memories of the river and the tower..


Unhappiness is seen as an emotional, intellectual as well as an ontolgical state in the play. It is not historically defined, rather timeless or eternal.


Unhappiness is seen as a necessary outcome of hope (that Godot will come) and desire. There is a movement to the renunciation of desire in the play.


Unhappiness is seen as a fag-end or a point of exhaustion as far as reasonableness is concerned.


Especially with Estragon and even with Vladimir, unhappiness is also related with physiological decay--the fall of the body apart from the disintegration of mind, another innate condition, as seen in the play.

Monday, February 8, 2016

I need a few quotes on the point of 'Everybody in our world has a story. Discuss in relation to a text studied, in this case 'Of Mice and Men.''I...

There are indeed several poignant inner stories in the characters from 'Of Mice and Men'.


Quote about Curley from Candy:



'He done quite a bit in the ring.  He's a lightweight, and he's handy'



It is also worth noting that Curley is described as 'pugancious' in his demeanour as he enters the bunkhouse. He also viciously targets Lennie as 'he hates big guys'.


Curley's wife tells Lennie about her life before Curley and the excitement of meeting a man at a dance hall who told her she had star potential -



He says he was gonna put me in the movies. Said I was a natural. Soon's he got back to Hollywood, he was gonna write to me...



Unfortunately he never did write: Curley's wife believed that her mother stole his letters.


George has very mixed feelings about being with Lennie. He has had plenty of time to contemplate the positive and negative aspects of their relationship. At the beginning of the novel he explodes -



Whatever we ain't got, that's what you want. God a'mighty, if I was alone I could live so easy. I could go get a job an' work, an no trouble. No mess at all, and when the end of the month come I could take my fifty bucks and go into town and get whatever I want...




However, when discussing their unique relationship later in the text he observes:



Course Lennie's a God damn nuisance most of the time, but you get used to goin' around with a guy an' you can't get rid of him.



Lennie does not have a clear recollection of Aunt Clara, only to note that she used to give him mice but 'that lady's gone.' He remembers very little until she becomes the voice of his conscience towards the end of the novel.

What technological and engineering advancements did the Romans develop?

The Romans also made huge advancement in military technology. Josephus the Jewish historian speaks about a few of the powerful weapons of the Romans.


The Romans also were able to use the plastic properties of the concrete to build fancier buildings.


The Romans also had the ability to flood amphitheaters to put on spectacle and even stage naval battles. This was quite amazing. There is a great article on this by C. Coleman in the Journal of Roman Studies.


Finally, the Romans also build great bridges.


For more information on Roman architecture, read the ancient Roman author, Vitruvius.

What is the period of the asteroid's orbit? Answer in units of year.The period of the earth around the sun is 1 year and its distance id 150...

We assume that the period of earth and its distance from the sun is T1 and R1.


We assume that the perod of the arteroid is T2 with a distance R2 from the sun.By Newton Kepler's Law,


(T2/T1)^2 = ( R2/R1)^3.


Therefore,


T2 = T1* sqrt[(R2/R1)^3].................(1)


R1 = 150 million km = 150*10^6*10^3= 1.5*10^11 meter. T1 = 1 year. R2 =239million km = 239*10^6*10^3 m = 2.39*10^11 meter. Substituting the values in (1) we get:


T = 1 * sqrt[(239/150)^3]


=2.011221777 year of earth is the asteroid,s period.

In "Angela's Ashes," why did the nuns move Frank to another room?

Frank catches typhoid fever and ends up in the hospital.  He has his own room, and very few visitors.  While there, the girl in the room next door begins talking to him through the wall.  She is Patricia Morgan, a very forward and stubborn young lady - also, incidentally, a very sick one.  She insists on talking to Frank, even after the nuns warn them both to keep quiet. 


Seamus, the janitor, brings books for the kids, and Patricia insists on reading through the wall.  Although Frank protests at the poetry she loves to read, she begins to read the Highwayman, and Frank gets sucked into the story.  At about the midpoint, the nuns catch on that they are still "chatting", and they move Frank upstairs to an old ward, where he is alone in his bed and not in the proximity of any other rooms.


Patricia dies shortly after.  Seamus, taking pity on Frank, alone and now grief-stricken at losing this friend, brings him the story of the Highwayman. 


Patricia is Frank's first female "interest."  Although he doesn't refer to her in the terms that he does when later taking about Teresa, it is clear that he is fond of her.  He thinks back on her often as he grows up.  This incident serves two purposes - it shows, through this "opposite sex relationship", that Frank is growing up; it also further underlines Frank's criticism of the Catholic church.  It was the strict and unrelenting narrow-mindedness of the nuns that oppressed both young people.

In The Awakening, how is Chopin's tone towards marriage conveyed through diction, details, and language?

First of all, diction is the author's choice of words, phrases, sentence structure, and figurative language that all work together to create the meaning of the text. Second, the narrator's voice may not always represent the author's voice and therefore may not represent the author's tone, but only the narrator's tone; although sometimes time and history have established a link between a particular author and their "narrative voice" and tone.

To prove the narrator's tone toward marriage in The Awakening, which you may presuppose to be Kate Chopin's tone, the analysis of a small sample of passages will get you started on your way to as detailed an analysis as is needed. Pertaining to language, when speaking of marriage, the narrator and/or Chopin establishes a disapproving and saddened tone by using gloomy words like "lamentable," such as when Edna decline to go to a marriage by telling her husband that weddings were "lamentable spectacle." Also, the fact of whom Edna was addressing--she was addressing her husband to whom she was once wed--enhances the disapproving, saddened tone. The example of to whom the speaker is speaking (Edna to her husband) would be part of syntax, or sentence structure, which would fall under the category of diction.

A more detailed example from diction of the tone of disapproval and sadness toward marriage relates to Chopin's authorial narrative choice of what is called middle diction (how the average educated person of the Pontellier's wealthy class would speak). Chopin uses middle diction to express negatives thoughts and feelings in correctly and calmly constructed language. For example, consider this negative string of reflections: "She could not have told why she was crying. Such experiences as the foregoing were not uncommon in her married life. They seemed never before to have weighed much against the abundance of her husband's kindness...." These negative thoughts are all expressed in a "positive" way, not a complaining, whining sort of way, through the correct employment of Chopin's diction choice.

An examples of details demonstrating the narrator's and/or Chopin's tone of disapproval and sadness toward marriage is in the detail of Edna sitting alone in the midnight hours on the veranda crying after being foolishly and ignorantly insulted by her husband who is obviously calloused and arrogant. Imagery (of the visual and tactile sort combined) conveying tone is incorporated in this same scene: Edna's peignoir (delicate robe) sleeve is so damp from wiping her flood of tears that she gives up trying to wipe them at all. [Note: Detail and imagery are part of the broader category of mood.]

In "Dover Beach," consider the tides here and how the speaker dwells primarily on the ebb tide. What does that seem to say to him about his world?

In the opening stanza of Arnold's poem, the sea is 'calm', it being 'full'. Later in the same stanza, the poet gives us the image of the endless backward and forward movement of the waves, 'the grating roar of pebbles' generating, 'with tremulous cadence slow', a melancholy music eternally audible.


Arnold dwells on the ebb tide in the 3rd stanza:



The Sea of Faith


Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore


Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.


But now I only hear


Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,


Retreating to the breath


Of the night wind, down the vast edges drear


And naked shingles of the world.



These lines refer to an allegorical 'Sea of Faith' which was, in the past, a mode of protection for the whole of mankind, like a rounded piece of clothing around the shores of life. That faith of the pre-Industrial days is now gone in the modern times of doubts, disputes, conflicts & controversies. The receding movement of the 'Sea of Faith' leaves back a barren, waste land, the world lying stripped naked. The image of the ebb tide thus signifies the crumbling of faith and its resultant spiritual vacuum.

What does Emerson mean in the following quote from "Self-Reliance"?"Though I confess with shame I sometimes succumb and give the dollar, it is a...

Throughout the paragraph in "Self-Reliance" that this excerpt closes, Emerson discusses his view of charity, specifically giving money to charities or individuals for charitable purposes. He mentions in the lines above the quote the following organizations for which he has no use:



"but your miscellaneous popular charities; the education at college of fools; the building of meeting-houses to the vain end to which many now stand; alms to sots; and the thousandfold Relief Societies. . ."



The author's contempt for the above groups stems from two ideas. First, Emerson's entire essay promotes man's fending and thinking for himself. If Emerson or others simply give another person everything that he or she needs, soon that person will rely upon others for everything and completelyrefute Emerson's philosophy of self-reliance. Relying on others is bondage in the author's eyes and hinders the country from becoming what Emerson envisions--an individualistic utopia full of open-minded, critical-thinking humans.


Emerson's second reason for disdaining the institutions which collect charities or build "meeting-houses" is that he believes that an individual should seek out the God within himself--not attend strictly formatted churches or rely on others to spread around one's money. Each person needs to be responsible for deciding whom to help or mentor and what to believe.


It is interesting that as strongly as Emerson believes in relying upon one's self, he still gives to these charities. However, his belief in personal growth and perfection correlates with the idea that he realized that even he had areas in which he could become more self-reliant.

Sunday, February 7, 2016

What are some similarities and differences regarding Desdemona's and Emilia's attitudes toward love, honesty, fidelity?

Desdemona is the perfect Renaissance wife in Acts II - V. Around her husband, she acts like the way women were taught to act.  She is the virgin, the quiet woman, the good wife--very submissive, knows her place, defers to the male.


When Othello is not around, at the beginning of Act II, she trades barbs with Iago.  She is witty, laughing at his misogynistic attitude toward women.  Notice that Emilia does not partake in the exchange.  Emilia too quietly plays the role of good wife.


But in Act IV, when they are in private, we begin to see differences.  Emilia is the first to realize Othello is jealous.  She admits that men are "but stomachs and we their food."  This suggests that--even though she has been quiet up till now--she knows first hand gender differences in marriage and the double standards men employ against women.  We get a sense that she does not love Iago.


Later, they discuss treating husbands the way they are treated:



DESDEMONA


I have heard it said so. O, these men, these men!
Dost thou in conscience think,--tell me, Emilia,--
That there be women do abuse their husbands
In such gross kind?

EMILIA
There be some such, no question.

DESDEMONA
Wouldst thou do such a deed for all the world?

EMILIA
Why, would not you?

DESDEMONA
No, by this heavenly light!

EMILIA
Nor I neither by this heavenly light;
I might do't as well i' the dark.

DESDEMONA
Wouldst thou do such a deed for all the world?

EMILIA
The world's a huge thing: it is a great price.
For a small vice.

DESDEMONA

In troth, I think thou wouldst not.

Herein lies the differences between the two: Emilia is much more worldly, pragmatic.  She is not playing a role; she speaks the way a modern woman might--one who has been taught to question roles openly.  Desdemona, on the other hand, is still the submissive woman who dare not treat her husband badly, even though he's about to kill her.  She willingly martyrs herself to let her husband maintain his reputation.